Search results

One less than the count is how many matches you get. Easy/lazy not-matcher matching.

Use split_string instead. Whether by splitting on location or on the discovery, it just depends on how accurate you want... what.

Synced in the CanGo changes including removing CanAdv qprop, adding LOVE, and possibly a few other tweaks.

Do you have a normal CCS set? Have you told the script to use it?

Ah. If it and the palindrome book and all of the other suchlikes are all fully depreciated, then I'm fine saying there's only one itemid ever. If this specific example is the only one where I'm only screwing the never-ascenders and the other ambiguous items may still affect things, I may as well...

You don't expect anyone to run Ed-core? Isn't that where the other quest item lives?

For most cases, yes. But not for all cases. And I'm going to need to do similar to CanAdv, BCA, and at least my personal copy of BBB since it still complains about the ambiguous library key, I'd rather something more future-resistant than hardcoded values. A single item key check may be right in...

A while ago I tried to use those fuzzy bits and it failed. Still does when I try what seems reasonable. So... *shrugs*

Because it's not just the library key, it's also the palindrome book and possibly future quest items. Also, [1764, 7302] is not human readable as anything useful. :)

LOVE has a... something? that tracks its unlock? Maybe multiple somethings? Can't note it without that. Think after I get the library key sorted I'll probably tweak the reporting request because as it stands, it's not really useful in any productive way. Plan for library key is probably going...

ASH will pull in whatever you tell it exists in the file. If you tell it that the file has strings instead of ints, it will pull in the ints as strings instead. Alternatively, you could potentially add a new third to your record definition and have both string and int. Up to you.

So true. Been waiting to think about how to best handle this. Will probably use the new .name since either option means we've got the proper quest item for this ascension type.

Nope. The fulminate route works fine, and while I didn't code that part, I've used it. My guess is what you've done here is run in softcore - aka, equip it yourself - mode, and you failed to do so. If you choose to run this in SC, you have four choices: 1) Set RunSCasHC, which makes the script...

Not a problem. With an updated since, it should now complain properly for people who try to run ED without the proper mafia version. :)

Have you updated your mafia to the latest version?

Ha. Shrink forks. Anyways, looks like there's a new choco - LOV Extraterrestrial Chocolate - with a 3/2/1 reduction. Hopefully ED should handle it properly now.

Confirmed that casting did set it as evoked. Also manually setting it back to false and recasting did mark Evoked to true. Looks implemented. Thanks! Only possible question is whether or not someone wants to add it to daily deed defaults for people who have the skill, but since we have custom...

Awesome, thanks! As this is a new once-a-day summoning skill, does it have tracking on that cast or should I make a new request for that?

Mafia was unaware that it went to combat, both throwing an unexpected redirect as well as failing to run combat until I 'refreshed' the relay browse by reloading main.php. I'm putting this as a new thread as the Invasion thread is marked as implemented, and so this new content should get a new...

Debugcreate?